Preliminary AAIB Report of Air India Plain Crash: Fuel Switch Misstep Behind June 12 Air India Crash

LATEST NEWS

7/12/20251 min read

Ahmedabad Crash: Fuel Switch an Error Blamed for Air India Boeing 787 Tragedy near Ahmedabad.

July 12, 2025, New Delhi — The Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) has released its 15-page preliminary report on the June 12 Air India Boeing 787-8 (Flight AI‑171) crash near Ahmedabad, which resulted in 260 fatalities—229 onboard, 31 on the ground—and only one survivor

Main Key Findings:

  • At 08:08:42 UTC, both engine fuel supply switches unexpectedly switched from RUN to CUTOFF just after acceleration to 180 knots—within a 32-second window from takeoff

  • Cockpit audio captured one pilot asking, “Why did you cut off?” while the other responded, “I didn’t,” highlighting pilot confusion

  • The Ram Air Turbine (RAT) deployed automatically upon engine failure, but efforts to relight fuel were only partially successful—Engine 1 attempted restart; Engine 2 did not respond, and the aircraft lost altitude

  • No evidence was found of bird strike, weather issues, or fuel contamination. Investigation is now examining whether this was human error, mechanical defect, or deliberate action

  • A 2018 FAA advisory flagged potential issues with Boeing 787 fuel switch locks, but no mandatory inspections followed

  • Both flight recorders (FDR & CVR) were recovered and decoded in India, with international experts from Boeing, GE, and NTSB assisting

Why This Matters in todays gengeration

  • Safety implications: Highlighting vulnerabilities in cockpit design and emergency protocols—fuel switches shouldn’t be accessed mid-flight.

  • Pilot training & procedures: The crew's reaction under crisis is under scrutiny; protocols may need updates.

  • Regulatory review: DGCA has ordered enhanced inspections of Boeing 787 fleets in India; broader industry oversight may follow

  • Pending full report: A final investigation, due mid-2026, will determine if it was pilot error, mechanical failure—or something else.

Takeaways for Readers

  • This incident may lead to swift changes in cockpit standard operating procedures (SOPs) and design improvements.

  • Crew confusion reflects the need for better simulator-based emergency drills.

  • Regulatory bodies may enforce mandatory inspections for similar aircraft systems.